Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Emergency application

Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC v. Francis J. Mathew, Judge, First Judicial District Court of New Mexico, Santa Fe County

Denied
No. 26A447Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice GorsuchFrom Supreme Court of New Mexico

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on October 2, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 0 days after filing

What's being asked

A private party asks the Supreme Court to pause (stay) a lower-court ruling from the Supreme Court of New Mexico while the appeal continues. The case is Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC v. Francis J. Mathew, Judge, First Judicial District Court of New Mexico, Santa Fe County.

What the Court did

Application (26A447) denied by Justice Gorsuch.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Days from filing to a ruling for 139 rulings on applications decided without a response since January 1, 2025: half took between 3 and 42 days (the band), and the median was 8 days (the tick). The mark is this application: ruled 0 days after filing.

What it means

This is a temporary order about what happens while the case is decided, not a ruling on who is right. The case continues in the Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A447. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 2, 2026