Skip to main content

Emergency application · Capital case

Lethal injection safety

Anthony Darrell Dugard Hines v. Tennessee

Denied
No. 26A175Stay applicationFiled by a prisoner facing executionPresented to Justice KavanaughFrom Supreme Court of Tennessee, Middle Division

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on August 13, 2026 and refused to halt the execution.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 4 days after filing

What's being asked

Anthony Darrell Dugard Hines, a Tennessee prisoner under a death sentence, asked the Supreme Court to pause his execution. He requested the pause while the Court considered whether to hear his case. Hines says Tennessee plans to use an execution physician he considers unqualified, and his age and recent strokes could complicate IV placement.

What the Court did

The Court refused to pause Hines’s execution and denied his request for a stay (a temporary pause). It also refused to hear his case; it denied his petition for Supreme Court review. The Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 85 rulings on capital applications decided without a response came 2 to 5 days after filing, and the median was 3 days; this one was ruled on 4 days after filing.

What it means

The emergency ruling does not decide who wins the underlying dispute; the Tennessee Supreme Court, Middle Division’s ruling remains in place. The docket lists no related case on the main legal question, and the Court set no argument.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 26A175. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 5, 2026