Skip to main content

Emergency application · Capital case

Racial bias in jury selection

Cedric Allen Ricks v. Texas

Denied
No. 25A983Stay applicationFiled by a prisoner facing executionPresented to Justice AlitoFrom Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on March 11, 2026 and refused to halt the execution.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 5 days after filing

What's being asked

Cedric Ricks, a Texas death-row prisoner, asked the Supreme Court to pause his execution while it considers whether to hear his case. Ricks says newly disclosed jury-selection notes support his claim that prosecutors struck jurors because of race. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals barred his later effort to raise that claim.

What the Court did

The Court refused to pause Ricks's execution and denied his request for a stay (a temporary pause). It also denied his petition for certiorari (refused to hear his case). The Court did not publish how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 77 rulings on capital applications decided without a response came 2 to 5 days after filing, and the median was 3 days; this one was ruled on 5 days after filing.

What it means

The emergency request concerned only a temporary pause; it did not decide whether Texas excluded jurors because of race. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' decision remains in place; the docket lists no related Supreme Court case or argument date.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A983. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026