Emergency application
Minority voters in district maps
Peter Kosinski v. Michael Williams
What did the Court do?
The Court granted the request on March 2, 2026: the lower court's ruling is on hold while the appeal continues.
Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case. Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, and Justice Jackson would have ruled the other way.
What's being asked
A private party asks the Supreme Court to pause (stay) a lower-court ruling from the Court of Appeals of New York while the appeal continues. The case is Peter Kosinski v. Michael Williams.
What the Court did
The Court granted the request on March 2, 2026: the lower court's ruling is on hold while the appeal continues.
- Concurred in a separate opinion
- Dissented
- Wrote separately
- Vote not published
- Concurring · 1agreed with the result, wrote separately
- Dissenting · 3recorded against the Court's order
What it means
This is a temporary order about what happens while the case is decided, not a ruling on who is right. The case continues in the Court of Appeals of New York.
Separate writings
Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson, dissenting
Sources
Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A915. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.