Skip to main content

Emergency application · Capital case

Autopsy reports and cross-examination

Charles Victor Thompson v. Texas

Denied
No. 25A847Stay applicationFiled by a prisoner facing executionPresented to Justice AlitoFrom Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on January 28, 2026 and refused to halt the execution.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 1 day after filing

What's being asked

Charles Victor Thompson, a Texas prisoner sentenced to death, asked the Supreme Court to pause his execution, scheduled for January 28, 2026. His petition says substitute medical examiners presented and endorsed an absent pathologist’s autopsy findings at his trials, violating his right to confront witnesses. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals threw out his later state challenge without reviewing its claims and refused a request to pause the execution.

What the Court did

The Court refused to pause Thompson’s execution and denied his petition for certiorari (a request for Supreme Court review). The order gives no explanation, and the Court did not publish how the justices voted; it did not decide his underlying claims.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 77 rulings on capital applications decided without a response came 2 to 5 days after filing, and the median was 3 days; this one was ruled on 1 day after filing.

What it means

This emergency request concerned only a temporary pause, not whether Thompson’s constitutional claims are correct. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ order remains in place: it threw out his later state challenge without reviewing its claims. There is no related Supreme Court case on the underlying claims, and the application was not set for argument.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A847. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 3, 2026