Skip to main content

Emergency application

Insurance dispute

Frederick Pina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Denied
No. 25A1116Stay applicationFiled by a private partyPresented to Justice KaganFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

What did the Court do?

The Court denied the request on April 10, 2026: the lower court's ruling stays in effect while the appeal continues.

Emergency rulings are temporary and do not decide the underlying case.

Filed Ruled 15 days after filing

What's being asked

Frederick Pina asks the Supreme Court to temporarily pause a Ninth Circuit ruling in his dispute with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The record does not explain what the dispute concerns or what the appeals court ordered.

What the Court did

Justice Kagan refused emergency help, denying Pina’s request to temporarily pause the Ninth Circuit ruling. No reasons are provided in the record, and the denial does not decide who wins the underlying dispute. The record does not report how the justices voted.

Vote not published · 9the order does not say how they voted
  1. Roberts
  2. Thomas
  3. Alito
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Kagan
  6. Gorsuch
  7. Kavanaugh
  8. Barrett
  9. Jackson
The order does not say how any justice voted, as is usual on the emergency docket.
Half of 212 rulings on applications decided without a response came 8 to 34 days after filing, and the median was 14 days; this one was ruled on 15 days after filing.

What it means

The denial leaves the Ninth Circuit ruling in place but does not decide who wins the dispute. No related Supreme Court merits case or argument is listed.

Sources

Facts on this page come from the Supreme Court docket, orders, and opinions for No. 25A1116. The answers restate that record in plain words; explainer copy is written from the record and the filings only.

Checked October 4, 2026