Head-to-head

Lina Noland, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Trade Commission vs. Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. AT&T, Inc. vs. Ongkaruck Sripetch, Petitioner v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Administrative Law cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.

The matchup

Relationship

Shared issue: Administrative Law
Why compared: Reviewed Administrative Law tags connect these current-term public cases.

Lina Noland, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Trade Commission: 1. Whether, after AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Federal Trade Commission may preserve an ex parte Section 13(b) asset freeze and receivership and obtain a revenue-based, multi-million-dollar monetary judgment through civil contempt where the judgment functions as restitution or disgorgement, is not tied to identified sustained losses, and the only rule-violation damages awarded under Section 19 were $6,829. 2. Whether the Seventh Amendment and due process permit a federal agency to obtain a $7,306,873.14 revenue-based monetary sanction, labeled civil compensatory contempt, through a bench proceeding where the sanction operates as a legal money judgment rather than compensation for proven individualized losses and where the ex parte freeze impaired Petitioners' ability to fund and preserve a jury defense.
Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. AT&T, Inc.: Are provisions of the Communications Act of 1934 that govern the Federal Communications Commission’s assessment and enforcement of monetary forfeitures consistent with the Seventh Amendment and Article III?
Ongkaruck Sripetch, Petitioner v. Securities and Exchange Commission: May the SEC seek equitable disgorgement under 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d)(5) and (d)(7) without showing investors suffered pecuniary harm?

Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.