Head-to-head

Deborah Kollman, as Executor of the Estate of Stephanie A. Smith, Petitioner v. Mercy Health-Clermont Hospital, LLC, et al. vs. In Re Patrick Starzenski, Petitioner

Immigration cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.

The matchup

Relationship

Shared issue: Immigration
Why compared: Reviewed Immigration tags connect these current-term public cases.

Deborah Kollman, as Executor of the Estate of Stephanie A. Smith, Petitioner v. Mercy Health-Clermont Hospital, LLC, et al.: 1. When a case is timely filed in state court and then removed to federal court, does the tolling provision in § 1367(d) stop the clock on the limitations period for any state-law claims as of the time the plaintiff initially, and timely, filed the claim in state court? 2. Or, does the clock stop only once the claim is pending in federal court, even if removal to federal court is beyond the plaintiff’s control?
In Re Patrick Starzenski, Petitioner: 1. Why and if they are above to the law and have permission to commit illegal or even criminal commitments in this jurisdiction from government of the United States of America, and if this permission is to treat people inhumanly and seizing them and their properties and keeping in custody without any reasons and indefinitely? 2. How many time really court may proceed Habeas Corpus regarding unreasonable and unlawful detention in these circumstances? 3. If, handling great power over several states in behalf of United States of America, the U.S. Court of Appeals can just refuse to justice process and procedure Habeas Corpus in these circumstances, and in result of that, allow to indefinite, without limits, unreasonable, and even unauthorized detention? 4. Whether statute neither require to indicate “ immediate-custodian ” nor even define this term?

Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.