Skip to main content

Proof of workplace discrimination

Wilson v. AIM Specialty Health

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Kellie Wilson’s petition asks the Supreme Court to review her employment-discrimination case against AIM Specialty Health and to discard the McDonnell Douglas test or change its final step, which concerns whether a worker must disprove the employer’s stated reason for an adverse job action.
What's at stake
Wilson’s challenge and her employment dispute with AIM remain unresolved; the Supreme Court has not ruled on her claims.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

She argues that Title VII requires proof that discrimination was a cause without which the action would not have happened.

Wilson argues Title VII requires a worker to show the job action would not have happened without discrimination, rather than disprove the employer’s stated reason at the last step of the McDonnell Douglas test for employment-discrimination cases.

Question presented

1. Whether this Court should overrule McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973). 2. Whether step three of McDonnell Douglas should require a plaintiff to disprove the employer’s proffered reasoned for an adverse employment action, when the plain language of Title VII merely requires a plaintiff to establish but-for causation.

What happens next

The Court’s next step is to decide whether to hear the petition. No oral argument or decision window is set before the Court agrees to hear it.

Documents

2

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Oct 23, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    Aug 14, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis