Skip to main content

Gun ban for felons

Nuno-Lopez v. United States

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
Cristian Nuño-Lopez asked the Supreme Court to review the Tenth Circuit’s decision upholding the judgment against him.
Who it affects
The Tenth Circuit’s judgment against Nuño-Lopez remains in place, but the Supreme Court did not rule on his constitutional claim.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Cristian Nuno-Lopez, Petitioner v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

He argues that the federal law barring firearm possession by people with felony convictions violates the Second Amendment on its face or as applied to him.

The challenged statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), bars people with felony convictions from possessing firearms.

Question presented

Does 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violate the Second Amendment on its face or as-applied to Mr. Nuño-Lopez?

Documents

1

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jun 2, 2026 · Court records

More questions

1
Did Nuño-Lopez challenge the law only as applied to him?
No. He challenged it both generally and as applied to his own case.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis