Skip to main content

Federal job restoration appeals

Morton v. Steiner

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
Russell Morton alleges agency officials failed to tell him he could appeal a restoration-related matter to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), preventing him from filing there on time.
Who it affects
Morton received no Supreme Court decision on whether his claims could be dismissed permanently because of the MSPB process.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Russell Morton, Jr., Petitioner v. David Steiner, Postmaster General
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

His petition asks whether his claims could be permanently thrown out without a chance to amend because the board was treated as the required forum.

The dispute concerns whether Morton had to bring his restoration-related claims to the Merit Systems Protection Board.

Question presented

Whether a federal employee’s claims may be dismissed with prejudice, without leave to amend, on the ground that certain restoration-related claims should have been pursued before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), where the employee alleged that agency officials failed to provide notice of MSPB restoration appeal rights and thereby prevented timely exhaustion of the administrative forum later deemed exclusive?

Documents

1

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    May 19, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis