Skip to main content

Pro se appeal deadlines

Ghosh v. New York City Housing Authority

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Ghosh asks whether the Second Circuit could refuse to excuse his missed deadline to object to a magistrate judge’s recommendation and bar review of employment-discrimination claims against the New York City Housing Authority, dismissed before discovery.
What's at stake
The Second Circuit’s deadline ruling left Ghosh without appeals-court review of his federal employment-discrimination claims against the New York City Housing Authority; the Supreme Court has not decided whether to review that result.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

He cites health and communication difficulties; the Court distributed his petition for conference, leaving Supreme Court review unresolved.

Ghosh represented himself and says health and communication difficulties affected his ability to meet the deadline. His claims were dismissed before the parties gathered evidence through discovery.

The petition asks whether a missed objection deadline can block appeals-court review when a self-represented worker’s claims were dismissed before evidence was gathered.

Question presented

1. Whether, consistent with Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), a court of appeals may refuse to excuse a pro se litigant’s failure to object to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation under the nonjurisdictional forfeiture rule when the record reflects health-related and communication difficulties affecting compliance with court deadlines. 2. Whether a court of appeals may treat the failure to object to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation as a complete bar to appellate merits review of a pro se litigant’s federal employment discrimination claims, where those claims were dismissed at the pleading stage before any factual record was developed through discovery.

What happens next

The petition was distributed for the Court’s Sept. 28, 2026, conference. That does not guarantee a decision date.

Documents

2

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Court Order added: Main Document

    Oct 14, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Aug 22, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis