Skip to main content

Silencer registration rules

Miller v. United States

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
Drew Miller asked the Supreme Court to review whether his lawyer failed to provide adequate help by refusing to challenge the federal law on unregistered silencers, and whether Miller’s guilty plea was involuntary because he was not told it would limit appeals of his constitutional claims.
Who it affects
The denial leaves Miller's two claims without a decision from the Supreme Court.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Drew Miller, Petitioner v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Court refused to hear the case (denied review), so it did not decide either claim.

Miller pleaded guilty to possessing unregistered silencers and challenged both his lawyer's handling of a constitutional challenge and what he understood about appeal limits.

Question presented

1. Whether trial counsel provided ineffective assistance under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), by refusing to file a motion to dismiss under New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), challenging the constitutionality of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) for possession of unregistered silencers, despite Petitioner’s repeated instructions and the absence of any circuit precedent upholding the statute post-Bruen. 2. Whether Petitioner’s guilty plea was involuntary under Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970), where counsel failed to advise that the plea would limit appellate review of constitutional challenges to plain error, and Petitioner objected during the colloquy specifically to preserve his Bruen and Second Amendment claims regarding loss of firearm rights.

Documents

1

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Mar 5, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis