Skip to main content

Gun rights after felony convictions

Antonio Daleon White v. United States

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
White asked the Supreme Court to review whether federal law may bar people with qualifying convictions from possessing guns and whether Congress may regulate possession based on a gun’s earlier crossing of state lines.
Who it affects
White’s request for Supreme Court review ended, but the Court did not resolve his claims about the law or Congress’s power in this case.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Antonio Daleon White, Petitioner v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Court refused to hear his case (denied the petition), so it did not decide these questions.

Federal law bars people with certain qualifying convictions from possessing firearms.

Question presented

1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) comports with the Second Amendment. 2. Whether Congress may criminalize intrastate firearm possession based solely on the firearm crossing state lines at some point before the defendant came to possess it. 3. Whether at minimum this Court should grant, vacate, and remand for re-consideration because of an intervening circuit decision that may invalidate precedent on which the panel opinion below relies.

Documents

1

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Aug 3, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis