Skip to main content

No. 25-7672October Term 2025Before Arguments

Docket 25-7672October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Harold Noel, Petitioner v. William Gibbons, et al.

from the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division.

Case status

Current stage
Before Arguments
Latest event
Accepted by the Court
Decision timing
No window until argument is scheduled.
Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
What it's about

from the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division.

Question presented

1. Whether the trial court erred in granting the Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss and finding that the Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to sovereign immunity. 2. Whether the trial court erred in granting the Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss and finding that the Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to the Appellant’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because the statute of limitations passed.

Case path

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Division / Accepted by the Court

Area

Supreme Court case awaiting argument

Timing

Expected by late June 2026, if argued this term

The Court granted review but has not yet scheduled oral argument. Once argued, the median case reaches a decision in 94 days. Nearly all cases are decided by the end of the term in which they are argued.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.Argument and decision days

Briefing

What it's about

Harold Noel has asked the Supreme Court to review a Tennessee case that was dismissed before it could move forward. His petition asks whether the lower courts were wrong to say the case was blocked by sovereign immunity (a rule that can bar some suits against the government) and by the statute of limitations (the filing deadline).

Argument

No oral argument is scheduled yet. Noel's petition asks the Court to review whether sovereign immunity and the filing deadline were used correctly to dismiss his case.

Impact

This matters for people whose cases may be thrown out before any evidence is heard because a defendant claims immunity or says the filing deadline passed. For example, someone in Tennessee with a similar dispute may care whether a court can end a case at the start on those grounds.

What is Noel v. Gibbons about?

Noel asks the Supreme Court to review whether Tennessee courts properly dismissed his case at the start. The dispute centers on sovereign immunity and the statute of limitations (filing deadline).

Who could be affected if the Court hears Noel v. Gibbons?

People whose cases face early dismissal on immunity or filing-deadline grounds could watch closely. The case could shape when courts consider such claims at all.

What happens next in Harold Noel v. William Gibbons?

The justices first decide whether to grant certiorari (agree to hear the case). No oral argument is scheduled, and no decision window is available yet.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jul 17, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3