Skip to main content

No. 25-7526October Term 2025Petition Pending

Docket 25-7526October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Mikel Mims, Petitioner v. United States

Mikel Mims has asked the Supreme Court to review a decision of the U.S.

Case status

Current stage
Petition Pending
Latest event
Petition pending
Decision timing
No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
Petition PendingNot granted
ArgumentsNot scheduled
Decision ReleasedNot scheduled
What it's about

Mikel Mims has asked the Supreme Court to review a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. His petition appears to raise an issue concerning a court’s authority to hear and decide a case.

Question presented

May a district court rely exclusively on the ancillary jurisdiction doctrine to enforce a restitution judgment notwithstanding the existence of legislation independently authorizing that very act?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit / Petition pending

Area

Petition for review pending

Briefing

What it's about

Mikel Mims asks the Supreme Court to review an Eleventh Circuit decision involving enforcement of a restitution judgment. The question is whether a district court may rely only on ancillary jurisdiction (authority connected to an existing case) when legislation separately authorizes enforcement.

Argument

The petition for certiorari (the Court's decision to hear a case) has been filed, and oral argument is not yet scheduled.

Impact

The case could affect how federal courts collect restitution ordered in criminal cases. For example, it could shape what legal authority a court must use when seeking payment from a person who owes restitution.

What is at stake in Mims v. United States?

The case asks whether a federal court can use ancillary jurisdiction alone to enforce a restitution judgment despite a law authorizing that enforcement.

Who could be affected by the Mims case?

People ordered to pay federal criminal restitution, victims seeking payment, and federal courts could be affected by the answer.

What happens next in Mims v. United States?

The Supreme Court will first decide whether to hear the petition. Oral argument has not been scheduled.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 3, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3