Skip to main content

No. 25-6989October Term 2025Petition Pending

Docket 25-6989October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Jesus Herrera-Salazar, Petitioner v. United States

Jesus Herrera-Salazar asks the Supreme Court to review whether the federal government may prosecute him again for being “found in” the United States after an earlier prosecution for the same illegal-reentry offense.

Case status

Current stage
Petition Pending
Latest event
Petition pending
Decision timing
No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
Petition PendingNot granted
ArgumentsNot scheduled
Decision ReleasedNot scheduled
What it's about

Jesus Herrera-Salazar asks the Supreme Court to review whether the federal government may prosecute him again for being “found in” the United States after an earlier prosecution for the same illegal-reentry offense. He argues that the Double Jeopardy Clause bars a second prosecution unless the government proves he was removed from the country after the first case and then illegally reentered.

Question presented

Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits a second prosecution for the crime of illegally reentry, specifically, the “found in” offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), where the government fails to show that, after the first prosecution of the defendant for being found in the United States, the defendant was removed from the country and later reentered the country illegally?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit / Petition pending

Area

Petition for review pending

Briefing

What it's about

Jesus Herrera-Salazar asks the Supreme Court to decide whether the Double Jeopardy Clause blocks a second federal prosecution for being “found in” the United States under the illegal-reentry law. He says the government must show he was removed after the first case and then illegally reentered before prosecuting him again.

Argument

The case is at the petition stage and has not been scheduled for oral argument. Herrera-Salazar argues that a second prosecution is barred unless the government proves a removal and later illegal reentry.

Impact

The case could affect people charged more than once under the federal illegal-reentry law. For example, it could determine whether a person may face a new charge without proof that they left the country and later returned after an earlier case.

What is at stake in Herrera-Salazar v. United States?

The Court is being asked whether double jeopardy bars a second “found in” prosecution without proof of removal and a later illegal reentry.

Who could be affected by this case?

People facing repeated federal illegal-reentry charges could be affected. The case concerns when prosecutors may bring a second charge for being found in the country.

What happens next in Herrera-Salazar v. United States?

The Court may act on the petition for certiorari (the decision whether to hear the case). Oral argument has not been scheduled.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 3, 2026
Primary materials6
Context reporting3