Skip to main content

No. 25-1417October Term 2025Petition Pending

Docket 25-1417October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Christopher Fonte, Petitioner v. Memorial Hospital of Laramie County, dba Cheyenne Regional Medical Center, et al.

Christopher Fonte asks the Supreme Court to review a Tenth Circuit ruling involving his federal claim against Cheyenne Regional Medical Center under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).

Case status

Current stage
Petition Pending
Latest event
Petition pending
Decision timing
No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
Petition PendingNot granted
ArgumentsNot scheduled
Decision ReleasedNot scheduled
What it's about

Christopher Fonte asks the Supreme Court to review a Tenth Circuit ruling involving his federal claim against Cheyenne Regional Medical Center under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). He argues that the lower court wrongly barred the federal claim by applying a Wyoming notice-of-claim requirement more broadly than Wyoming courts apply it.

Question presented

Whether federal courts exceed their authority by enforcing state law in a form the State’s highest court does not recognize, thereby nullifying a federal statutory right in violation of the Due Process Clause?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit / Petition pending

Area

Petition for review pending

Briefing

What it's about

Christopher Fonte asks the Supreme Court to review a Tenth Circuit decision involving his federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) claim against Cheyenne Regional Medical Center. He says the lower court applied a Wyoming notice-of-claim rule more broadly than Wyoming courts do, blocking his federal claim.

Argument

The case has not been scheduled for oral argument. Fonte argues that due process limits federal courts from ending federal statutory claims by applying state procedures in a form the state's highest court does not recognize.

Impact

The case could affect patients who bring EMTALA claims when state procedural rules are involved. For example, a patient could lose a federal emergency-care claim if a federal court applies a state filing requirement differently from state courts.

What is at stake in Fonte v. Memorial Hospital of Laramie County?

The case tests whether a federal court may bar an EMTALA claim by applying a Wyoming notice-of-claim rule more broadly than Wyoming courts apply it.

Who could be affected by the dispute over Wyoming's notice rule?

Patients bringing federal emergency-care claims could be affected when state procedural requirements are used to limit those claims in federal court.

What happens next in Fonte v. Memorial Hospital of Laramie County?

The Supreme Court could schedule oral argument or take another action on the petition. No decision timing has been set.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 3, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3