Skip to main content

No. 25-1367October Term 2025Before Arguments

Docket 25-1367October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Roofing Designs by JR, L.L.C., dba Roofing Designs, Petitioner v. Royal American Construction, Incorporated, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Case status

Current stage
Before Arguments
Latest event
Accepted by the Court
Decision timing
No window until argument is scheduled.
Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
What it's about

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Question presented

Whether the doctrine of judicial estoppel can be invoked to bar a plaintiff who fails to fully or accurately disclose a civil claim in bankruptcy filings from pursuing that claim simply because there is a “potential motive” for nondisclosure, regardless of whether there is evidence that the plaintiff in fact acted in bad faith.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit / Accepted by the Court

Area

Supreme Court case awaiting argument

Timing

Expected by late June 2026, if argued this term

The Court granted review but has not yet scheduled oral argument. Once argued, the median case reaches a decision in 94 days. Nearly all cases are decided by the end of the term in which they are argued.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.Argument and decision days

Briefing

What it's about

Roofing Designs by JR is asking the Supreme Court to review a Fifth Circuit rule that can block a plaintiff from pursuing a civil claim after the claim was not fully or accurately disclosed in bankruptcy filings. The question is whether a court may do that based only on a possible motive for nondisclosure, even without evidence of bad faith.

Argument

The case is still at the petition stage, and oral argument has not been scheduled. No substantive justice or advocate reactions are available yet.

Impact

The case matters to people and businesses that filed for bankruptcy and later want to pursue a lawsuit. For example, a plaintiff that left a claim off bankruptcy papers could lose the chance to keep pursuing that case, even if there is no evidence of bad faith.

What is the fight in Roofing Designs v. Royal American Construction?

The petition asks whether a plaintiff can be barred from suing after not fully listing the claim in bankruptcy papers. The key issue is whether possible motive alone is enough, without proof of bad faith.

Who could be affected if the Court takes Roofing Designs by JR?

People and businesses that filed bankruptcy and later want to sue could be affected. An omitted claim on bankruptcy forms could keep them from pursuing that case in court.

What happens next in Roofing Designs by JR?

The justices must decide whether to grant certiorari (agree to hear the case). Oral argument has not been scheduled, and no decision window is available yet.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jul 23, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3