No. 25-1292October Term 2025Petition Pending
Yesit Campo, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Arlevys Molina, et al., Petitioners v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.
The estate of Arlevys Molina seeks Supreme Court review of a Florida wrongful-death case against Uber and related companies.
Case status
- Current stage
- Petition Pending
- Latest event
- Petition pending
- Decision timing
- No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.
- What it's about
The estate of Arlevys Molina seeks Supreme Court review of a Florida wrongful-death case against Uber and related companies. The petition argues that the case should proceed to a jury trial so the jury can evaluate the evidence and draw any appropriate adverse inferences against the defendants.
Question presented
1. In a wrongful death civil case and trial, pursuant to the Seventh Amendment’s right of trial by jury, should a demanded jury trial proceed against the lower tribunal Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER (FL), LLC and RASIER-DC, LLC in order to allow the jury to hear and weigh the record evidence including the opportunity to draw adverse inferences from the record evidence against the lower tribunal Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER (FL), LLC and RASIER-DC, LLC? 2. In a wrongful death civil case and trial, pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process, should a demanded jury trial proceed against the lower tribunal Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER (FL), LLC and RASIER-DC, LLC in order to allow the jury to hear and weigh the record evidence including the opportunity to draw adverse inferences from the record evidence against the lower tribunal Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER (FL), LLC and RASIER-DC, LLC?
- Case path
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District / Petition pending
- Area
Petition for review pending
Briefing
What it's about
The estate of Arlevys Molina asks the Supreme Court to review a Florida wrongful-death case against Uber and related companies. The petition says a requested jury trial should go forward so jurors can weigh the evidence and draw appropriate adverse inferences against the companies.
Argument
The case is pending, and oral argument has not been scheduled. The petition asks the Court to allow a jury trial against Uber and related companies.
Impact
The case concerns whether a wrongful-death claim reaches a jury when a party has requested one. For Molina's estate and the Uber-related companies, that could determine whether jurors, rather than a judge alone, assess the evidence.
What is at stake in Campo v. Uber?
The estate seeks a jury trial in its Florida wrongful-death case. It wants jurors to evaluate evidence and potentially draw adverse inferences against Uber-related companies.
Who could be affected by the case against Uber?
Molina's estate and Uber Technologies, Rasier, Rasier (FL), and Rasier-DC are directly affected. The case also concerns jury-trial rights in this civil dispute.
What happens next in Campo v. Uber?
The Court may take a scheduling step or decide whether to grant certiorari (agree to hear the case). Oral argument has not been scheduled.
Related cases
Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 3, 2026
- Method
- Methodology