Skip to main content

No. 25-1284October Term 2025Before Arguments

Docket 25-1284October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Mario Dion Woodward, Petitioner v. Alabama

from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Case status

Current stage
Before Arguments
Latest event
Accepted by the Court
Decision timing
No window until argument is scheduled.
Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
What it's about

from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Question presented

1. Whether a state court in a postconviction proceeding may summarily deny a Brady claim for failure to meet Brady’s materiality standard based on the alleged failure to plead how the withheld evidence of an alternative perpetrator “would have countered the State’s significant evidence of guilt.”? 2. Whether a state court in a postconviction proceeding may arbitrarily apply state-law statutes of limitation and pleading requirements to bar a Brady claim based on evidence material to a capital conviction first discovered during the postconviction phase.

Case path

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama / Accepted by the Court

Area

Supreme Court case awaiting argument

Timing

Expected by late June 2026, if argued this term

The Court granted review but has not yet scheduled oral argument. Once argued, the median case reaches a decision in 94 days. Nearly all cases are decided by the end of the term in which they are argued.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.Argument and decision days

Grounding

Grounding
Primary-source trail available.
Note
Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 1, 2026
Primary materials4