Skip to main content

No. 25-1273October Term 2025Before Arguments

Docket 25-1273October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Stephen Joseph Johnson, Petitioner v. Montana

from the Supreme Court of Montana.

Case status

Current stage
Before Arguments
Latest event
Accepted by the Court
Decision timing
No window until argument is scheduled.
Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
What it's about

from the Supreme Court of Montana.

Question presented

What is the appropriate standard for assessing whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment permits a prosecution witness to testify by two-way video?

Case path

Supreme Court of Montana / Accepted by the Court

Area

Supreme Court case awaiting argument

Timing

Expected by late June 2026, if argued this term

The Court granted review but has not yet scheduled oral argument. Once argued, the median case reaches a decision in 94 days. Nearly all cases are decided by the end of the term in which they are argued.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.Argument and decision days

Briefing

What it's about

Stephen Joseph Johnson has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review what standard courts should use to decide whether a prosecution witness may testify by two-way video. The request comes from proceedings in Montana and focuses on the Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses.

Argument

No oral argument is scheduled. Johnson has filed a petition asking the justices to take up the Sixth Amendment question.

Impact

The answer could affect criminal trials where the state wants a witness to appear on a screen instead of in the courtroom. For example, it could shape whether a defendant questions a key accuser face to face or over live video.

What is Johnson v. Montana about?

It asks what standard courts should use to decide if a prosecution witness may testify by two-way video. The issue centers on the Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses.

Who could be affected if the Court takes Johnson v. Montana?

Criminal defendants, prosecutors, judges, and witnesses could all be affected. The answer may shape when live video can replace in-person testimony at trial.

What happens next in Johnson v. Montana?

The justices must decide whether to hear the case. No oral argument is scheduled yet, and no decision window is available.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jul 17, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3