Skip to main content

No. 25-1061October Term 2025Before Arguments

Docket 25-1061October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Holly Ann Elkins, Petitioner v. United States

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Case status

Current stage
Before Arguments
Latest event
Accepted by the Court
Decision timing
No window until argument is scheduled.
Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments AheadUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming
What it's about

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Question presented

Is the Fifth Circuit’s categorical approach to instrumentalities of interstate commerce constitutional?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit / Accepted by the Court

Area

Supreme Court case awaiting argument

Timing

Expected by late June 2026, if argued this term

The Court granted review but has not yet scheduled oral argument. Once argued, the median case reaches a decision in 94 days. Nearly all cases are decided by the end of the term in which they are argued.

The Court does not announce decision dates in advance.Argument and decision days

Briefing

What it's about

Holly Ann Elkins has asked the Supreme Court to review a Fifth Circuit rule that treats phones as instrumentalities of interstate commerce as a category. The case asks whether that broad approach fits the Constitution's limits on Congress's commerce power.

Argument

This is only a petition for certiorari (a request for Supreme Court review), and no oral argument is scheduled yet. The petition argues the Fifth Circuit used a categorical rule that "phones just are instrumentalities of interstate commerce."

Impact

The answer could affect when federal law reaches conduct tied to phones or similar tools, even if the conduct is local. For example, a person in a federal case involving a phone could be affected by whether courts automatically treat that device as part of interstate commerce.

What is Elkins asking the Supreme Court to decide?

Elkins says the Fifth Circuit went too far by automatically treating phones as instrumentalities of interstate commerce. She asks whether that approach is constitutional.

Who could be affected by Elkins v. United States?

People in federal cases involving phones or similar tools could be affected. The answer may shape when Congress can regulate conduct that seems local.

What happens next in Holly Ann Elkins v. United States?

The Court will decide whether to grant certiorari, meaning hear the case. No oral argument is scheduled yet, and no decision window is available.

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jul 17, 2026
Primary materials5
Context reporting3