Harold R. Berk, Petitioner v. Wilson C. Choy, et al.
Federal courts hearing these Delaware malpractice suits do not have to enforce the state’s expert-affidavit filing requirement.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jan 20, 2026
- What it's about
The Court unanimously reversed and remanded a Third Circuit decision. Justice Barrett authored the 9-0 opinion addressing procedural requirements in federal litigation.
Question presented
Must a Delaware law providing that a complaint must be dismissed unless it is accompanied by an expert affidavit be enforced by a federal court sitting in diversity?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released Jan 20, 2026
- Area
Civil Procedure
Briefing
What it's about
The Supreme Court said Delaware’s rule requiring an expert affidavit with a medical malpractice complaint does not apply in federal court when the case is there under diversity jurisdiction. The Court unanimously reversed the Third Circuit and sent the case back for further proceedings.
Vote
Impact
This affects medical malpractice plaintiffs and defendants in federal court in Delaware. For example, a patient suing in federal court will not have the case thrown out just for failing to file the state affidavit at the start.
What's next
The case returns to the lower courts, which must continue the litigation without treating Delaware’s affidavit rule as a bar in federal court. Lawyers and judges in similar diversity cases will now adjust their filings and motions to match that rule.
What was the main fight in Berk v. Choy?
The dispute was whether a federal court must enforce Delaware’s rule requiring an expert affidavit with a medical malpractice complaint. The Supreme Court said no.
Who is most affected by this ruling?
Patients, doctors, hospitals, and insurers in Delaware medical malpractice cases filed in federal court are directly affected. The ruling changes an early filing requirement in those cases.
What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision?
The case goes back to the lower courts for more proceedings. Those courts must move forward without dismissing the suit based on Delaware’s affidavit requirement alone.
Decision
What the Court decided
Federal courts hearing these Delaware malpractice suits do not have to enforce the state’s expert-affidavit filing requirement.
- Result
- Reversed
Impact
People bringing Delaware medical-malpractice claims in federal court are directly affected. A patient can file the complaint without Delaware’s expert affidavit of merit. For example, Berk’s suit was dismissed before; now that state filing rule does not apply there. Next, more plaintiffs may choose federal court in diversity (a federal case based on state-law claims). The ruling also matters beyond Delaware because it addresses state procedural
Not official Court text.
Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jun 1, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials11
Supreme Court docket 24-440
docket | Jun 8, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jun 8, 2026
Questions Presented
brief
Opinion of the Court - AB
opinion | Jan 20, 2026
opinion
opinion | Jan 20, 2026
Oral Arguments - Berk
audio | Oct 6, 2025
Petition
brief | Oct 16, 2024
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jun 1, 2026



