No. 24-440October Term 2025Decided Jan 20, 2026Updated Sep 1, 2026
Berk v. Choy
Harold R. Berk, Petitioner v. Wilson C. Choy, et al.
Delaware's expert-affidavit rule cannot require dismissal of a medical-malpractice complaint in federal court.
Case status
Decided 9-0 · January 20, 2026 · Opinion by Justice Barrett
Read the opinion (PDF)- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jan 20, 2026
- Argued alongside
- What it's about
The Court unanimously reversed and remanded a Third Circuit decision. Justice Barrett authored the 9-0 opinion addressing procedural requirements in federal litigation.
Question presented
Must a Delaware law providing that a complaint must be dismissed unless it is accompanied by an expert affidavit be enforced by a federal court sitting in diversity?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released Jan 20, 2026
- Area
Civil Procedure
Decision
What the Court decided
Delaware's expert-affidavit rule cannot require dismissal of a medical-malpractice complaint in federal court.
- Result
- Reversed
Impact
People filing Delaware medical-malpractice claims in federal court are affected. They need not attach an expert affidavit (a professional statement the suit has merit) to a complaint. For example, Berk may proceed without Delaware’s affidavit when filing federally. The ruling distinguishes federal litigation from Delaware state-court litigation. It may guide federal courts when state procedural rules (rules governing lawsuit steps) conflict with Federal Rules.
Not official Court text.
Vote
- Vote split
- 9-0
- Majority author
- Amy Coney Barrett
Opinion documents
Briefing
What it's about
The Court unanimously reversed the Third Circuit and said Delaware's expert-affidavit requirement does not apply in federal court. The case concerned a medical-malpractice complaint brought under federal diversity jurisdiction (when parties are from different states).
Vote
Justice Barrett wrote the 9–0 opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh; Justice Jackson concurred.
The Court voted 9-0 to reverse the Third Circuit. Justice Barrett authored the opinion.
““Delaware’s affidavit law does not apply in federal court.””
Impact
Medical-malpractice plaintiffs in Delaware federal court will not have their cases dismissed solely because they did not file Delaware's required expert affidavit. This matters, for example, to a patient suing a Delaware health-care provider in federal court.
What's next
The case returns to the lower courts for further proceedings consistent with the Court's decision. Federal courts handling similar Delaware medical-malpractice cases must not enforce the affidavit requirement as a basis for dismissal.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Berk v. Choy?
The Court ruled that Delaware's expert-affidavit requirement does not apply in federal court. It reversed the Third Circuit.
Who is affected by the Berk v. Choy decision?
Medical-malpractice plaintiffs and defendants in Delaware federal court are affected. Plaintiffs cannot have a case dismissed solely for lacking Delaware's expert affidavit.
What happens next in Berk v. Choy?
The case returns to the lower courts for further proceedings. Those courts must apply the Supreme Court's decision on Delaware's affidavit requirement.
Timing
Decided January 20, 2026
The Court released its decision 106 days after oral argument on October 6, 2025. The median for cases argued in October is 139 days.
Documents
Opinions
Amy Coney Barrett
Audio
Key filings
Briefs on file: 25View on supremecourt.gov
Activity
Docket activity8
AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis
Sep 1, 2026 | Generated
AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary
Sep 1, 2026 | Generated
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Sep 1, 2026 | Generated
Opinion added: Opinion of the Court - AB
Jan 20, 2026 | Court records
Opinion added: opinion
Jan 20, 2026 | Court records
Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Berk
Oct 6, 2025 | Court records
Brief added: Petition
Oct 16, 2024 | Court records
Brief added: Questions Presented
Court records
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 1, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials11
Supreme Court docket 24-440
docket | Sep 3, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Sep 3, 2026
Questions Presented
brief
Opinion of the Court (Amy Coney Barrett)
opinion | Jan 20, 2026
Opinion
opinion | Jan 20, 2026
Oral argument
audio | Oct 6, 2025
Petition
brief | Oct 16, 2024
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 1, 2026