No. 24-440October Term 2025Decided Jan 20, 2026
Harold R. Berk, Petitioner v. Wilson C. Choy, et al.
Federal courts sitting in diversity do not enforce Delaware's expert-affidavit filing rule for these cases.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Jan 20, 2026
- What it's about
The Court unanimously reversed and remanded a Third Circuit decision. Justice Barrett authored the 9-0 opinion addressing procedural requirements in federal litigation.
Question presented
Must a Delaware law providing that a complaint must be dismissed unless it is accompanied by an expert affidavit be enforced by a federal court sitting in diversity?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released Jan 20, 2026
- Area
Civil Procedure
Briefing
What it's about
The Supreme Court said Delaware's rule requiring an expert affidavit with a medical malpractice complaint does not apply in federal court. The justices reversed the Third Circuit in a 9-0 opinion by Justice Barrett.
Vote
Impact
This changes how medical malpractice suits are screened in federal court in Delaware when the court is hearing a state-law claim because of diversity (different-state parties). For example, a plaintiff in federal court cannot be automatically thrown out just for failing to attach Delaware's affidavit at the start.
What's next
The case goes back to the lower courts to continue under the Supreme Court's rule. Federal judges in similar Delaware cases must now use federal filing procedures instead of dismissing complaints for missing the state affidavit.
What was the main fight in Harold R. Berk v. Wilson C. Choy?
The dispute was whether a federal court had to enforce Delaware's rule requiring an expert affidavit with a medical malpractice complaint. The Supreme Court said no.
Who is most affected by the Court's decision in Berk v. Choy?
Medical malpractice plaintiffs and defendants in Delaware federal court are most affected. Plaintiffs face one fewer state filing barrier at the start of the case.
What happens next after the Supreme Court's decision in Berk v. Choy?
The case returns to the lower courts for further proceedings. Judges must now handle the complaint without applying Delaware's affidavit requirement in federal court.
Decision
What the Court decided
Federal courts sitting in diversity do not enforce Delaware's expert-affidavit filing rule for these cases.
- Result
- Reversed
Impact
People filing Delaware medical malpractice claims in federal court are directly affected. They no longer need an affidavit of merit (an expert statement supporting the claim) to sue. For example, a patient in federal court cannot be dismissed solely for missing that affidavit. Next, more plaintiffs may choose federal court for Delaware malpractice claims. The ruling also clarifies that conflicting state procedural rules need not control federal cases.
Not official Court text.
Timing
Decided January 20, 2026
The Court released its decision 106 days after oral argument on October 6, 2025. The median for cases argued in October is 138 days.
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials11
Supreme Court docket 24-440
docket | Jul 23, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 23, 2026
Questions Presented
brief
Opinion of the Court - AB
opinion | Jan 20, 2026
opinion
opinion | Jan 20, 2026
Oral Arguments - Berk
audio | Oct 6, 2025
Petition
brief | Oct 16, 2024
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026