Skip to main content

No. 20-827October Term 2020Decided Jul 13, 2022

Docket 20-827October Term 2020 (2020–2021)

United States v. Zubaydah

The justices are being asked whether courts can keep discovery going when the government says the subject involves state secrets.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jul 13, 2022
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJul 13, 2022
What it's about

This case was about whether Abu Zubaydah could obtain testimony from former CIA contractors for use in a Polish investigation into his alleged mistreatment at a CIA site in Poland. The United States argued that letting discovery go forward would reveal state secrets by confirming or denying the existence of a clandestine CIA facility there.

Question presented

Whether the court of appeals erred when it rejected the United States ’ assertion of the state-secrets privilege based on the court ’ s own assessment of potential harms to the national security, and required discovery to proceed further under 28 U.S.C. 1782(a) against former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) contractors on matters concerning alleged clandestine CIA activities.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Jul 13, 2022

Area

Administrative Law

Briefing

What it's about

Abu Zubaydah wants testimony from former CIA contractors for use in a Polish investigation into his alleged mistreatment at a CIA site in Poland. The United States says that letting discovery move forward could reveal state secrets by confirming or denying a clandestine CIA facility there.

Vote

The case has not been scheduled for argument. The United States says discovery would risk exposing state secrets, while Zubaydah says the testimony is needed for a Polish investigation.

Impact

The case could shape how far courts can go when someone seeks evidence tied to secret intelligence activity. That matters for people seeking proof in foreign investigations, and for government officials or contractors who may be asked to testify.

What's next

Watch for the Court to schedule oral argument or make another procedural move. No decision window is available yet.

What is the core fight in United States v. Zubaydah?

The fight is over whether former CIA contractors can be forced to give testimony for a Polish investigation. The government says even that process could expose protected state secrets.

Why could this case matter beyond Abu Zubaydah?

It could affect future efforts to obtain evidence about secret national security operations. That includes requests aimed at contractors, officials, or records tied to intelligence work.

What should court watchers look for next in this case?

The next key step is whether the Supreme Court sets oral argument. Until then, there is no announced timetable for a final decision.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The justices are being asked whether courts can keep discovery going when the government says the subject involves state secrets.

Impact

The case could shape how far courts can go when someone seeks evidence tied to secret intelligence activity. That matters for people seeking proof in foreign investigations, and for government officials or contractors who may be asked to testify.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents

Timing

Decided July 13, 2022

The Court released its decision on July 13, 2022 without hearing oral argument.