Skip to main content

No. 19-108October Term 2019Decided Dec 10, 2020

Docket 19-108October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

United States v. Briggs

At stake is whether the military could charge rape from that 1986-to-2006 period without a time limit or had only five years to do so.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Dec 10, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedDec 10, 2020
What it's about

This case asked whether military rape charges based on conduct from 1986 to 2006 were filed in time under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The dispute was over whether rape counted as an offense "punishable by death," which would mean there was no statute of limitations, even though the Constitution did not allow the death penalty for raping an adult woman.

Question presented

Whether the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces erred in concluding-contrary to its own longstanding precedent-that the Uniform Code of Military Justice allows prosecution of a rape that occurred between 1986 and 2006 only if it was discovered and charged within five years.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces / Decision released Dec 10, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

The case asks whether military rape charges tied to conduct from 1986 to 2006 were brought on time under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The fight is over whether rape counted as an offense "punishable by death," which would mean there was no filing deadline, even though the Constitution barred the death penalty for raping an adult woman.

Vote

The case is still pending, and oral argument has not been scheduled. The government says rape was still an offense "punishable by death" under the military code, while the lower military court said a five-year limit applied to these charges.

Impact

The answer could decide whether old military rape cases may go forward or must be thrown out as too late. That directly affects service members accused in older cases and victims seeking prosecution years after the alleged crime.

What's next

The next sign of movement would be oral argument or another scheduling step from the Court. No decision window is available yet.

What is the core dispute in United States v. Briggs?

The Court is being asked whether older military rape charges were filed within the proper time limit. The key issue is whether those offenses counted as "punishable by death" under military law.

Why could this case matter beyond the people directly involved?

It could affect many older military sexual-assault prosecutions from the 1986-to-2006 period. Some cases could continue, while others could be barred as filed too late.

What should readers watch for next in this case?

Watch for the Court to schedule oral argument or take another formal step. Until then, there is no announced timetable for a decision.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

At stake is whether the military could charge rape from that 1986-to-2006 period without a time limit or had only five years to do so.

Impact

The answer could decide whether old military rape cases may go forward or must be thrown out as too late. That directly affects service members accused in older cases and victims seeking prosecution years after the alleged crime.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents

Timing

Decided December 10, 2020

The Court released its decision on December 10, 2020 without hearing oral argument.