Skip to main content

No. 19-1039October Term 2019Decided Jun 29, 2021

Docket 19-1039October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey

This case asks whether a private pipeline company can use federal eminent-domain power to take land interests claimed by a state.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jun 29, 2021
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedJun 29, 2021
What it's about

This case concerned whether PennEast, a private company with federal approval to build an interstate natural-gas pipeline, could use eminent domain to take rights-of-way over land in which New Jersey claimed an interest. The dispute turned on whether the Natural Gas Act gives private certificate holders the federal government’s condemnation power against state-owned property and whether New Jersey could block the suit by invoking sovereign immunity.

Question presented

1. Whether the NGA delegates to FERC certificate holders the authority to exercise the federal government's eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest? 2. Did the Court of Appeals properly exercise jurisdiction over this case?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit / Decision released Jun 29, 2021

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

PennEast, a private company with federal approval to build an interstate natural-gas pipeline, wants to take rights-of-way over land in which New Jersey claims an interest. The fight is over whether the Natural Gas Act lets private pipeline companies use the federal government's eminent-domain power against state-owned property, and whether the appeals court properly took up the case.

Vote

No Supreme Court decision is available yet, and no oral argument is scheduled in the record provided. PennEast says the Natural Gas Act gives certificate holders federal condemnation authority, while New Jersey argues the state cannot be forced into that kind of suit.

Impact

The case could affect how easily federally approved pipeline projects cross land tied to a state. For example, it could shape whether a state can block a pipeline route by asserting an interest in the needed property.

What's next

The next sign of movement would be oral argument or another scheduling order from the Court. No decision window is available yet based on the record provided.

What is the main dispute in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey?

The Court is being asked whether the Natural Gas Act lets a private pipeline company condemn land interests claimed by a state. It is also reviewing whether the Third Circuit properly exercised jurisdiction.

Why could this case matter outside this one pipeline project?

It could affect future interstate pipeline projects that need to cross land connected to a state. States, energy companies, landowners, and regulators could all feel the impact.

What should readers watch for next in this case?

Watch for the Court to schedule oral argument or issue another procedural order. The record provided does not show a current decision window.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

This case asks whether a private pipeline company can use federal eminent-domain power to take land interests claimed by a state.

Impact

The case could affect how easily federally approved pipeline projects cross land tied to a state. For example, it could shape whether a state can block a pipeline route by asserting an interest in the needed property.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents

Timing

Decided June 29, 2021

The Court released its decision on June 29, 2021 without hearing oral argument.