Skip to main content

Protection for bankruptcy transfers

Merit Management Group v. FTI Consulting

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court left the Seventh Circuit's judgment in place and sent the case back to the lower court.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · February 27, 2018 · Opinion by Justice Sotomayor

What it’s about
FTI, Valley View Downs’ trustee, sought to recover a payment Valley View made to Merit Management for shares; Merit argued banks’ role triggered a Bankruptcy Code rule protecting some transfers.
Who it affects
The Seventh Circuit's judgment remains in place in FTI's effort to recover Valley View Downs' share-payment from Merit for the bankruptcy estate.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled intermediary banks did not trigger the rule, agreed with the Seventh Circuit, and sent the case back to the lower court (remanded).

The case asked whether a bankruptcy rule protecting some transfers from recovery applies when financial institutions handle a payment.

Question presented

Whether the safe harbor of 11 U.S.C. § 546(e) prohibits avoidance of a transfer made by or to a financial institution, without regard to whether the institution has a beneficial interest in the property transferred, consistent with decisions from the Second, Third, Sixth, Eighth, and Tenth Circuits, but contrary to decisions from the Eleventh Circuit and now the Seventh Circuit.

What the Court decided

Holding

Judgment is affirmed and case remanded. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.

Result
Affirmed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomas
  4. Kennedy
  5. Ginsburg
  6. Sotomayorwrote the opinion
  7. Roberts
  8. Gorsuch
  9. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The case returns to the lower court for further proceedings.

Each side's argument

FTI Consulting
As Valley View Downs' trustee, FTI sought to recover the payment from Merit for the bankruptcy estate.
Merit Management Group
Merit argued that banks' involvement brought the payment within a Bankruptcy Code rule protecting some transfers from recovery.

Documents

3

Docket activity

8
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 3 more
  • Opinion added: Opinion

    Feb 27, 2018 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Feb 27, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis