Skip to main content

Warnings before police shootings

White v. Pauly

Updated Oct 19, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court wiped out the Tenth Circuit's judgment and sent the case back for further proceedings.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 8-0 · January 9, 2017 · Per curiam

What it’s about
The dispute asked whether Officer Ray White violated a clearly established Fourth Amendment right when he fired without warning after joining an ongoing confrontation; Daniel Pauly represents the estate of Samuel Pauly.
Who it affects
The Tenth Circuit's judgment no longer stands, and Daniel Pauly's case for Samuel Pauly's estate returns to that court for more proceedings.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Ray White v. Daniel T. Pauly, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Samuel Pauly
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court granted review, wiped out the Tenth Circuit’s judgment (vacated it), and sent the case back for further proceedings (remanded it).

Daniel T. Pauly brought the case as the personal representative of Samuel Pauly's estate.

Question presented

Does an officer’s failure to shout a warning before firing--when that officer joined an ongoing confrontation--constitute a violation of a clearly established Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive use of force?

What the Court decided

Holding

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for certiorari is granted; the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated; and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Result
Vacated

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Concurred in a separate opinion
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 7joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomas
  4. Kennedy
  5. Sotomayor
  6. Roberts
  7. Alito
Concurring · 1agreed with the result, wrote separately
  1. Ginsburgwrote separately
8 justices joined the judgment (1 writing separately).

What's next

The case returns to the Tenth Circuit for further proceedings under the Supreme Court's opinion.

Documents

1

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Opinion added: White

    Jan 9, 2017 · Court records

More questions

1
What facts did Justice Ginsburg say could still matter?
She said further proceedings could still consider whether Officers Truesdale and Mariscal identified themselves as police and, for White, when he arrived, what he saw, and whether he had time to identify himself and tell Samuel Pauly to drop his weapon.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 19, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis