Skip to main content

Pausing filing deadlines

Artis v. District of Columbia

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court overturned the D.C. Court of Appeals' judgment and sent Artis's case back to a lower court.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 5-4 · January 22, 2018 · Opinion by Justice Ginsburg

What it’s about
The dispute was whether the deadline for Stephanie Artis to refile her state-law claims against the District of Columbia paused while her federal case was pending, or whether she had only 30 days after dismissal.
Who it affects
The D.C. Court of Appeals' judgment in Artis's case was overturned, but the final outcome of her state-law claims remains unresolved.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Artis v. District of Columbia
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that the deadline paused during the federal case and for 30 days afterward, overturned the D.C. Court of Appeals’ decision (reversed it), and sent the case back (remanded).

Artis had state-law claims against the District of Columbia and sought to refile them after her federal case was dismissed.

Section 1367(d) is a federal rule about filing deadlines for related state-law claims; this case asked how it applies after a federal case ends.

Question presented

Whether the tolling provision in §1367(d) suspends the limitations period for the state-law claim while the claim is pending and for thirty days after the claim is dismissed, or whether the tolling provision does not suspend the limitations period but merely provides 30 days beyond the dismissal for the plaintiff to refile?

What the Court decided

Holding

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 5joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Ginsburgwrote the opinion
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Roberts
Dissenting · 4disagreed with the result
  1. Thomas
  2. Kennedy
  3. Gorsuchwrote the dissent
  4. Alito
5 justices joined the judgment, 4 dissented.

What's next

A lower court will take up the case again; no timing for the next ruling is stated.

Documents

3

Docket activity

8
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 3 more
  • Opinion added: Artis

    Jan 22, 2018 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Jan 22, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis