Prison complaint rules
Ross v. Blake
In brief
The Supreme Court wiped out the Fourth Circuit’s ruling and sent the case back so the lower court can reconsider whether the grievance process was available to Blake.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided 8-0 · June 6, 2016 · Opinion by Justice Kagan
- What it’s about
- Michael Ross challenged a ruling that Shaidon Blake could avoid the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s grievance requirement because he mistakenly thought an internal investigation satisfied it.
- Who it affects
- The Fourth Circuit must reconsider Blake’s claim that the grievance process was not available to him; the Supreme Court did not decide that claim.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The Supreme Court wiped out that ruling (vacated it) and sent the case back to the lower court (remanded) to consider Blake’s claim that the grievance process was not actually available to him.
The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires inmates to complete available administrative grievance steps, and this dispute concerns whether Blake had access to that process.
Question presented
Did the Fourth Circuit misapply this Court's precedents in holding, in conflict with several other federal courts of appeals, that there is a common law "special circumstances" exception to the Prison Litigation Reform Act that relieves an inmate of his mandatory obligation to exhaust administrative remedies when the inmate erroneously believes that he satisfied exhaustion by participating in an internal investigation?
What the Court decided
Holding
Blake’s contention that the prison’s grievance process was not in fact available to him warrants further consideration below. 787 F. 3d 693, vacated and remanded.
- Result
- Vacated
The Court's reasoning
The Court said Blake’s claim that the prison grievance process was not actually available to him needs further review by the lower courts.
The vote
What's next
The Fourth Circuit will take another look at Blake’s claim that he could not use the grievance process.
Each side's argument
- Michael Ross
- Ross argued that the law has no “special circumstances” exception for an inmate who mistakenly thinks an internal investigation satisfies the grievance requirement.
- Shaidon Blake
- Blake contended that the prison grievance process was not actually available to him.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 1 moreShow fewer
Brief added: Questions Presented
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.