Skip to main content

Vague deportation rules

Sessions v. Dimaya

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court left the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in place, so the definition cannot be used against Dimaya in his removal case.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 5-4 · April 17, 2018 · Opinion by Justice Kagan

What it’s about
The Supreme Court agreed with the Ninth Circuit and left in place its ruling that 18 U.S.C. §16(b)—a definition used in immigration cases to identify crimes that can lead to removal—was too unclear under the Constitution to be used against Dimaya.
Who it affects
The Ninth Circuit’s ruling against using that definition in Dimaya’s removal case remains in place.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Sessions v. Dimaya
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

Immigration law uses the definition in 18 U.S.C. §16(b) to identify crimes that can lead to removal from the United States.

Question presented

Whether 18 U.S.C. 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act's provisions governing an alien's removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague.

What the Court decided

Holding

Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, III, IV-B, and V, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to Parts II and IV-A, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Roberts, C. J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy and Alito, JJ., joined as to Parts I-C-2, II-A-1, and II-B.

Result
Affirmed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 5joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kaganwrote the opinion
  3. Ginsburg
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Gorsuchalso wrote separately
Dissenting · 4disagreed with the result
  1. Thomaswrote a dissent
  2. Kennedy
  3. Robertswrote a dissent
  4. Alito
5 justices joined the judgment, 4 dissented.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished its review, and the Ninth Circuit’s ruling remains in place.

Documents

3

Docket activity

8
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 3 more
  • Opinion added: Sessions

    Apr 17, 2018 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Apr 17, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis