Skip to main content

Securities lawsuits in state courts

Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court agreed with the California appeals court and left its decision in place.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · March 20, 2018 · Opinion by Justice Kagan

What it’s about
Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund brought a class action against Cyan in California state court, alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933; Cyan argued that federal law barred state courts from hearing the case and allowed it to be moved to federal court.
Who it affects
The California appeals court's decision remains in place in the class action between the fund and Cyan.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court unanimously agreed with the California appeals court that state courts can hear class actions alleging only those claims and that defendants cannot move them to federal court under that law.

The dispute asked whether state courts can hear class actions alleging only claims under the Securities Act of 1933.

Question presented

Whether state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over covered class actions that allege only '33 Act claims.

What the Court decided

Holding

Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.

Result
Affirmed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kaganwrote the opinion
  3. Thomas
  4. Kennedy
  5. Ginsburg
  6. Sotomayor
  7. Roberts
  8. Gorsuch
  9. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The Supreme Court has finished this docket action, leaving the California appeals court's decision in place.

Each side's argument

Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund
The fund alleged in its class action that Cyan violated the Securities Act of 1933.
Cyan, Inc.
Cyan argued that federal law barred state courts from hearing the case and allowed it to be moved to federal court.

Documents

3

Docket activity

9
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 4 more
  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Opinion

    Mar 20, 2018 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Mar 20, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis