Contracts for veteran-owned businesses
Kingdomware Technologies v. United States
In brief
The VA's veteran-owned-business contracting procedures are mandatory for every VA contracting decision.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided 8-0 · June 16, 2016 · Opinion by Justice Thomas
- What it’s about
- Kingdomware Technologies challenged the Department of Veterans Affairs’ duty to reserve contracts for veteran-owned small businesses when at least two could make reasonable bids.
- Who it affects
- The VA must use the veteran-business contracting rule in all its contracting decisions, including setting aside contracts when it reasonably expects two or more veteran-owned firms to make reasonable bids.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
After those contracts were completed, the Court said the dispute could recur but end before review; it ruled the VA must follow the rule, overturned the Federal Circuit, and sent the case back (remanded).
By the time the Supreme Court reviewed the dispute, other contractors had completed the short-term contracts at issue.
Federal law sets rules for when the VA must reserve contracts for veteran-owned small businesses.
Question presented
1. Is this case moot if the contracts at issue have already been performed? 2. Is the Department of Veterans Affairs’ “set-aside,” which restricts competition to veteran-owned businesses when there is a reasonable expectation that two or more such businesses will offer reasonable bids for the contract, mandatory?
What the Court decided
Holding
1. This Court has jurisdiction to reach the merits of this case. For a federal court to have Article III jurisdiction “an actual controversy must exist... through all stages of the litigation.” Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc., 568 U. S. ___, ___. Here, no court is capable of granting petitioner relief initially sought in the complaint because the shortterm FSS contracts have been completed by other contractors. However, the controversy is “ ‘capable of repetition, yet evading review.’ ” Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U. S. 1, 17. 2. Section 8127(d)’s contracting procedures are mandatory and apply to all of the Department’s contracting determinations. 754 F. 3d 923, reversed and remanded.
- Result
- Reversed
The Court's reasoning
Other contractors had completed the short-term contracts, so the Court said it could not provide Kingdomware the relief it first requested. But similar disputes could arise again and end before courts could review them, and the law made the VA's procedures mandatory for all its contracting decisions.
The vote
What's next
The case returns to the lower court for further proceedings under the Supreme Court's ruling.
Documents
Opinions
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis
AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary
Show 4 moreShow fewer
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Opinion added: Kingdomware Tech
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.