Skip to main content

Recovering spent health plan money

Montanile v. Board of Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court overturned the Eleventh Circuit: a plan cannot collect from a participant’s separate assets if the participant has wholly spent the settlement on items that cannot be traced.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 8-1 · January 20, 2016 · Opinion by Justice Thomas

What it’s about
The National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan sought repayment from Robert Montanile’s car-accident settlement after paying his medical bills.
Who it affects
An ERISA benefit plan cannot collect from a participant’s separate assets if the participant has wholly spent the settlement on items that cannot be traced.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Robert Montanile v. Board of Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that if Montanile had wholly spent the settlement on items that could not be traced, the plan could not collect from his separate assets; it overturned the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling and sent the case back to the lower court (remanded).

This case concerned ERISA, a federal law for employee benefit plans, and the kinds of court-ordered repayment those plans can seek.

Question presented

For purposes of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, is a reimbursement to an employee welfare benefit plan “appropriate equitable relief” if the identified source of the reimbursement has already been spent or disbursed?

What the Court decided

Holding

When an ERISA-plan participant wholly dissipates a third-party settlement on nontraceable items, the plan fiduciary may not bring suit under §502(a)(3) to attach the participant’s separate assets. 903, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 8joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomaswrote the opinion
  4. Scalia
  5. Kennedy
  6. Sotomayor
  7. Roberts
  8. Alito
Dissenting · 1disagreed with the result
  1. Ginsburgwrote the dissent
8 justices joined the judgment, 1 dissented.

From the opinions

“He can escape that reimbursement obligation, the Court decides, by spending the settlement funds rapidly on nontraceable items.”

— Justice Ginsburg(dissent)

What's next

The case returns to the Eleventh Circuit for further proceedings under the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Documents

1

Docket activity

9
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 4 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Montanile

    Jan 20, 2016 · Court records

More questions

1
How much did Montanile pledge to repay?
Justice Ginsburg’s separate opinion says he pledged to reimburse the plan for at least $121,044.02 in medical expenses from a $500,000 settlement.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis