Skip to main content

Same-sex marriage rights

Obergefell v. Hodges

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court required states to license same-sex marriages and recognize those lawfully performed elsewhere.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 5-4 · June 26, 2015 · Opinion by Justice Kennedy

What it’s about
James Obergefell challenged Ohio’s refusal to recognize his same-sex marriage, which was performed in another state.
Who it affects
States must issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and recognize same-sex marriages lawfully licensed and performed in another state.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for James Obergefell v. Richard Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court overturned the Sixth Circuit and decided that the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to license same-sex marriages and recognize those lawfully performed elsewhere.

Ohio's constitution and laws barred recognition of same-sex marriages lawfully entered in other states.

Question presented

1. DOES THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT REQUIRE A STATE TO LICENSE A MARRIAGE BETWEEN TWO PEOPLE OF THE SAME SEX? 2. DOES THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT REQUIRE A STATE TO RECOGNIZE A MARRIAGE BETWEEN TWO PEOPLE OF THE SAME SEX WHEN THEIR MARRIAGE WAS LAWFULLY LICENSED AND PERFORMED OUT-OF-STATE? 3. Whether Ohio's constitutional and statutory bans on recognition of marriages of same-sex couples validly entered in other jurisdictions violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 4. Whether Ohio's refusal to recognize a judgment of adoption of an Ohio-born child issued to a same-sex couple by the courts of a sister state violates the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

What the Court decided

Holding

The Fourteenth Amendment requires a State to license a marriage between two people of the same sex and to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-State. 772 F. 3d 388, reversed.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 5joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Kennedywrote the opinion
  4. Ginsburg
  5. Sotomayor
Dissenting · 4disagreed with the result
  1. Thomaswrote a dissent
  2. Scaliawrote a dissent
  3. Robertswrote a dissent
  4. Alitowrote a dissent
5 justices joined the judgment, 4 dissented.

From the opinions

“The fundamental right to marry does not include a right to make a State change its definition of marriage.”

— Chief Justice Roberts(dissent)

What's next

States must follow the ruling by issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples and recognizing qualifying marriages performed in other states.

Documents

2

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Obergefell

    Jun 26, 2015 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis