Skip to main content

Withheld evidence in criminal trials

Wearry v. Cain

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court ruled that Wearry’s rights were violated, overturned the Louisiana court’s judgment, and sent his case back.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · March 7, 2016 · Per curiam

What it’s about
Michael Wearry argued that evidence withheld from his murder trial violated his constitutional right to a fair process.
Who it affects
Wearry’s case returns to the Louisiana postconviction court for further proceedings.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Michael Wearry v. Burl Cain, Warden
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court agreed that his rights were violated, overturned the Louisiana post-conviction court’s judgment, and sent the case back for further proceedings (remanded).

Wearry argued that prosecutors withheld evidence from his murder trial, violating his right to a fair process.

Question presented

To prevail on a claim that suppression of evidence violated his due process rights under Brady v. Maryland , does a defendant need to show that, more likely than not, he would have been acquitted if the suppressed evidence in question had been made available to him?

What the Court decided

Holding

* * * Because Wearry’s due process rights were violated, we grant his petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, reverse the judgment of the Louisiana postconviction court, and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Result
Reversed

The vote

Majority author
Per Curiam

From the opinions

“There is no question in my mind that the prosecution should have disclosed this information, but whether the information was sufficient to warrant reversing petitioner’s conviction is another matter.”

— Justice Alito(dissent)

What's next

The case returns to the Louisiana postconviction court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

Documents

1

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Opinion added: Wearry

    Mar 7, 2016 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis