Skip to main content

Right to a capable lawyer

Anthony Ray Hinton v. Alabama

Updated Oct 19, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court wiped out the Alabama appeals court's judgment and sent Hinton's case back for further proceedings.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · February 24, 2014 · Per curiam

What it’s about
Anthony Ray Hinton challenged how Alabama courts applied the constitutional test for whether his trial lawyer provided effective counsel.
Who it affects
The Alabama appeals court's judgment no longer stands in Hinton's case, and further proceedings are required.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Anthony Ray Hinton v. Alabama
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court wiped out the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals’ judgment (vacated it) and sent the case back for further proceedings (remanded it).

The dispute concerns a constitutional test that asks whether a trial lawyer's work fell below a reasonable standard and could have affected the trial's outcome.

Question presented

Did the Alabama courts properly apply the rule established by the Supreme Court's decision in Strickland v. Washington , which stated that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated if the trial attorney's performance falls below an objective standard of reasonableness and there is a reasonable chance the outcome of the trial was affected?

What the Court decided

Holding

* * * The petition for certiorari and Hinton’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Result
Vacated

The vote

Majority author
Per Curiam

What's next

The case returns to the Alabama courts for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

Documents

1

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Opinion added: Hinton

    Feb 24, 2014 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 19, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis