Skip to main content

Horne v. Department of Agriculture

Updated Oct 19, 2026

In brief

The Ninth Circuit can hear the handlers’ claim, but whether the marketing rules took their property remains undecided.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · June 10, 2013 · Opinion by Justice Thomas

What it’s about
Marvin Horne and other raisin handlers argued that marketing rules took their property and raised the claim as a defense in an Agriculture Department enforcement case.
Who it affects
Horne and the other handlers can pursue their claim in the Ninth Circuit, but the Court did not decide whether the marketing rules took their property.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Marvin D. Horne v. Department of Agriculture
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Court overturned the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, decided that court could hear the claim, and sent the case back (remanded), without deciding whether the rules took the property.

Horne and the other handlers raised their property claim as a defense in an Agriculture Department enforcement case.

Question presented

1. Can the Takings Clause be used as a defense in actions regarding a government-mandated transfer of funds? 2. If so, does the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit have jurisdiction over the case?

What the Court decided

Holding

The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction to decide petitioners’ takings claim. 673 F. 3d 1071, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomaswrote the opinion
  4. Scalia
  5. Kennedy
  6. Ginsburg
  7. Sotomayor
  8. Roberts
  9. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The case returns to the Ninth Circuit, which can decide the handlers’ claim. The Supreme Court left open whether the rules took their property.

Documents

2

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Horne

    Oct 30, 2014 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Horne

    Jun 10, 2013 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 19, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis