Federal grants and free speech
Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International
In brief
The Court ruled that the government violated the First Amendment by making federal HIV/AIDS funding depend on nonprofits adopting an anti-prostitution policy.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided 6-2 · June 20, 2013 · Opinion by Chief Justice Roberts
- What it’s about
- The Supreme Court agreed with the Second Circuit (affirmed) that requiring groups to adopt an explicit policy opposing prostitution to receive federal HIV/AIDS funding violated the First Amendment.
- Who it affects
- The federal government cannot make the HIV/AIDS funding at issue depend on the nonprofit groups adopting that policy.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The Court said the condition forced groups to affirm a belief that could not be confined to the government-funded program.
The nonprofit groups challenging the requirement had not adopted the required anti-prostitution policy.
The federal funding rule required groups to have an explicit policy opposing prostitution and sex trafficking.
Question presented
Does a requirement that non-governmental organizations institute an explicit anti-prostitution policy in order to receive federal funding violate the First Amendment?
What the Court decided
Holding
The Policy Requirement violates the First Amendment by compelling as a condition of federal funding the affirmation of a belief that by its nature cannot be confined within the scope of the Gov - ernment program. 651 F. 3d 218, affirmed.
- Result
- Affirmed
The Court's reasoning
The Court said the policy forced organizations to affirm a belief that, by its nature, could not be kept within the federally funded program.
The vote
From the opinions
“This Policy Requirement is nothing more than a means of selecting suitable agents to implement the Government’s chosen strategy to eradicate HIV/AIDS.”
What's next
The Second Circuit's ruling remains in place. Federal grant administrators may not require the nonprofit groups covered by the case to adopt the policy as a condition of the funding at issue.
Documents
Opinions
Audio
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis
AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary
Show 5 moreShow fewer
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.
Opinion added: Open Society
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.