Skip to main content

Mandatory minimum sentences

Allen Ryan Alleyne v. United States

Updated Oct 19, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court wiped out the Fourth Circuit’s judgment and sent Alleyne’s case back for further proceedings.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 5-4 · June 17, 2013 · Opinion by Justice Breyer

What it’s about
Allen Alleyne challenged a mandatory minimum sentence that depended on a fact found by the judge, raising whether the jury had to find that fact instead.
Who it affects
Alleyne’s case returns to the Fourth Circuit, but the order does not determine his final sentence.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Allen Ryan Alleyne v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court wiped out the Fourth Circuit’s judgment and sent the case back to the lower court (vacated and remanded).

The dispute asked whether a jury, rather than a judge, had to find a fact that increased the minimum sentence.

Question presented

1. Did the district court find enough evidence to convict Alleyne for armed robbery? 2. Did convicting Alleyne of aiding and abetting the robbery change the original indictment? 3. Should the court have imposed a minimum sentence for possession of a firearm in relation to a robbery?

What the Court decided

Holding

The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded. 348, vacated and remanded.

Result
Vacated

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 5joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyerwrote the opinion
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomasalso wrote separately
  4. Ginsburg
  5. Sotomayoralso wrote separately
Dissenting · 4disagreed with the result
  1. Scalia
  2. Kennedy
  3. Robertswrote a dissent
  4. Alitowrote a dissent
5 justices joined the judgment, 4 dissented.

From the opinions

“And because it does not affect the jury’s role, it does not violate the jury trial guarantee of the Sixth Amendment.”

— Chief Justice Roberts(dissent)

What's next

The case returns to the Fourth Circuit for further proceedings. The Supreme Court’s order does not specify what result that court should reach.

Documents

2

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Alleyne

    Oct 30, 2014 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Alleyne

    Jun 17, 2013 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 19, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis