Skip to main content

Reselling books made abroad

Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons

Updated Oct 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court ruled that the first-sale rule covers copyrighted copies made legally abroad, allowing them to be resold in the United States without the copyright owner’s permission.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 6-3 · March 19, 2013 · Opinion by Justice Breyer

What it’s about
Kirtsaeng imported and resold in the United States textbooks made abroad; John Wiley & Sons argued he needed its permission.
Who it affects
People who own copyrighted copies made legally abroad can resell them in the United States without the copyright owner’s permission under the first-sale rule.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that the rule allowing resale of lawfully made copies (the “first sale” doctrine) covers copies made abroad, overturned the appeals court’s ruling, and sent the case back to that court (remanded).

Kirtsaeng imported and resold textbooks made abroad in the United States. John Wiley & Sons said he needed its permission.

The case asked how the Copyright Act’s rules on importing copyrighted copies and reselling lawfully made copies fit together.

Question presented

If a copy was made legally, acquired abroad and then imported into the United States, can that foreign-made copy ever be resold within the United States without the copyright owner's permission under Section 602(a)(1) and Section 109(a) of the copyright act?

What the Court decided

Holding

The “first sale” doctrine applies to copies of a copyrighted work lawfully made abroad. 654 F. 3d 210, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 6joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyerwrote the opinion
  2. Kaganalso wrote separately
  3. Thomas
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Roberts
  6. Alito
Dissenting · 3disagreed with the result
  1. Scalia
  2. Kennedy
  3. Ginsburgwrote the dissent
6 justices joined the judgment, 3 dissented.

What's next

The appeals court will take up the case again under the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Documents

2

Opinions

  • Kirtsaeng

    Breyer, Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Ginsburg, Kennedy, Scalia, V-B-L

Audio

View the full docket on supremecourt.gov

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 18, 2026 · Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Kirtsaeng

    Sep 17, 2015 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Kirtsaeng

    Mar 19, 2013 · Court records

More questions

1
What did Justice Kagan say separately?
She agreed with the Court but said any problem from limiting the import ban came from an earlier Supreme Court decision, not from the Court’s reading of the first-sale rule here.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis