Skip to main content

When SEC deadlines begin

Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Updated Oct 19, 2026

In brief

The five-year clock for the SEC's enforcement case starts when the alleged violation occurs, and the Supreme Court overturned the Second Circuit's contrary ruling.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · February 27, 2013 · Opinion by Chief Justice Roberts

What it’s about
Marc Gabelli and Bruce Alpert’s case concerned when the five-year time limit for the SEC to bring an enforcement action starts: when the alleged violation occurs or when it is discovered.
Who it affects
For SEC enforcement actions covered by §2462, the five-year period starts when the violation happens, not when the SEC discovers it.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Court ruled that the clock starts when the violation occurs, overturned the Second Circuit’s ruling, and sent the case back to the lower court (remanded).

Section 2462 sets the five-year deadline at issue in the SEC's fraud enforcement case.

Question presented

Does the five-year statute of limitations begin when the SEC can first bring an action, or when the alleged violation is committed?

What the Court decided

Holding

The five-year clock in §2462 begins to tick when the fraud occurs, not when it is discovered. 653 F. 3d 49, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The Court's reasoning

The Court explained that a fraud victim's lack of knowledge does not delay the deadline in a government enforcement case.

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomas
  4. Scalia
  5. Kennedy
  6. Ginsburg
  7. Sotomayor
  8. Robertswrote the opinion
  9. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The case returns to the Second Circuit for further proceedings under the Supreme Court's timing rule.

Documents

2

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 19, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 19, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Gabelli

    Oct 30, 2014 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Gabelli

    Feb 27, 2013 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 19, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis