Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case Tracker
The Court, in plain English
Find a case
Topics
Home
/
Calendar
/
February 2017
Argument sitting
February 2017 oral arguments
←
January 2017
Full calendar
March 2017
→
4 cases across 3 argument days
·
Arguments begin at 10 a.m. Eastern
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
13
14
15
16
17
20
21
22
23
24
27
28
Argument day
More than one case
Three argument days, February 21 to February 28, 2017.
One of them has more than one case.
21
Tuesday, February 21, 2017
2 cases
Lawsuits over border shootings
Hernandez v. Mesa
1. WHETHER THE CLAIM IN THIS CASE MAY BE ASSERTED UNDER BIVENS v. SIX UNKNOWN FED. NARCOTICS AGENTS, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2. Does a formalist or functionalist analysis govern the extraterritorial application of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unjustified deadly force, as applied to a cross-border shooting of an unarmed Mexican citizen in an enclosed area controlled by the United States? 3. May qualified immunity be granted or denied based on facts-such as the victim's legal status- unknown to the officer at the time of the incident?
Decided
Jun 26, 2017
15-118
Appeals of agency subpoenas
McLane Co. v. EEOC
Should a district court’s determination on whether to enforce an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission subpoena be reviewed “de novo,” or without deference to the lower court’s determination?
Decided
Apr 3, 2017
15-1248
22
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
1 case
Power of attorney arbitration
Kindred Nursing Centers, L. P. v. Clark
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts a state rule that singles out arbitration agreements for disfavored treatment by requiring that an attorney-in-fact possess specific authority to enter into an arbitration agreement on behalf of a principal?
Decided
May 15, 2017
16-32
28
Tuesday, February 28, 2017
1 case
Considering consecutive gun sentences
Dean v. United States
Whether , Pepper v. United States , 562 U.S. 476, 131 s. Ct. 1229, 179 I. Ed. 2d 196 (2011) overruled United States v. Hatcher , 501 f.3d 931 (8th cir. 2007) and related opinions from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to the extent those opinions limit the district court's discretion to consider the mandatory consecutive sentence or sentences under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) in determining the appropriate sentence for the felony serving as the basis for the 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c) convictions?
Decided
Apr 3, 2017
15-9260