Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Argument sitting

April 2023 oral arguments

9 cases across 6 argument daysArguments begin at 10 a.m. Eastern
Six argument days, April 17 to April 26, 2023. Three of them have more than one case.

2 cases
Slack Technologies, LLC v. PiraniWhether Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 require plaintiffs to plead and prove that they purchased shares registered under the registration statement they claim is misleading.Decided 22-200Pugin v. GarlandIs Virginia’s offense of accessory after the fact to a felony an “offense relating to obstruction of justice” under the Immigration and Nationality Act?Decided 22-23

2 cases
United States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc.Whether a pharmacy chain knowingly violated the False Claims Act by overbilling the government while running a price-matching program.Decided 21-1326Groff v. DeJoyIs inconvenience to coworkers an “undue burden” under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 such that it excuses an employer from providing an accommodation requested for religious exercise?Decided 22-174

1 case
Counterman v. ColoradoWhether a person's threatening Facebook messages constitute a 'true threat' unprotected by the First Amendment.Decided 22-138

2 cases
Dupree v. YoungerTo preserve the issue for appellate review, must a party reassert in a post-trial motion a purely legal issue rejected at summary judgment?Decided 22-210Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. CoughlinWhether the tribe was protected from bankruptcy proceedings by sovereign immunity?Decided 22-227

1 case
Yegiazaryan v. SmaginWhether a foreign plaintiff states a “domestic injury” for purposes of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c), when the plaintiff owns a foreign judgment that the defendant has allegedly sought to evade through racketeering activity in the United States.Decided 22-381

1 case
Tyler v. Hennepin County1. Does taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violate the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause? 2. Is the forfeiture of property worth far more than needed to satisfy a debt a fine within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment?Decided 22-166