Head-to-head

Google LLC, Petitioner v. VirtaMove, Corp., et al. vs. Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. AT&T, Inc. vs. Ongkaruck Sripetch, Petitioner v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Administrative Law cases on the Supreme Court docket, side by side.

The matchup

Relationship

Shared issue: Administrative Law
Why compared: Reviewed Administrative Law tags connect these current-term public cases.

Google LLC, Petitioner v. VirtaMove, Corp., et al.: 1. Whether the PTO retains statutory authority to deny institution based on the “settled expectations” factor, where discretion is committed to the PTO and no statutory provision prohibits consideration of settled expectations. 2. Whether the “drastic and extraordinary” remedy of mandamus is appropriate where Google identifies no statutory text that has been violated and the Federal Circuit has held that an alternative vehicle—a notice-and-comment rulemaking challenge—remains available.
Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. AT&T, Inc.: Are provisions of the Communications Act of 1934 that govern the Federal Communications Commission’s assessment and enforcement of monetary forfeitures consistent with the Seventh Amendment and Article III?
Ongkaruck Sripetch, Petitioner v. Securities and Exchange Commission: May the SEC seek equitable disgorgement under 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u(d)(5) and (d)(7) without showing investors suffered pecuniary harm?

Built from reviewed issue tags and official docket records. Status lines and questions presented come from the tracked case data.