Skip to main content

Religious objections to pronoun rules

Kimberly Ann Polk v. Montgomery County Public Schools

Updated Nov 11, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Petition Pending

Awaiting an order on the petition

No decision timeline until the Court agrees to hear the case.

What it’s about
Kimberly Polk says Montgomery County Public Schools required her, contrary to her Christian beliefs, to use students’ requested pronouns and barred her from telling parents about school help with a child’s gender transition; after she refused, she could not continue teaching.
What's at stake
Polk’s effort to obtain Supreme Court review remains unresolved; the Court has not ruled on whether the school’s policies violated her rights.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about

Her petition challenges the Fourth Circuit’s ruling on her religious-freedom and free-speech claims and was distributed for a Supreme Court conference, which is not an agreement to hear the case.

Polk says she could not continue teaching after refusing to follow the requirements because of her Christian beliefs.

The case comes from the Fourth Circuit, whose ruling Polk is asking the Supreme Court to review.

Question presented

1. When public schools try to force teachers, over their religious objections, to use pronouns inconsistent with a student’s biological sex and to hide from parents information about their child’s gender expression at school, does Smith apply and foreclose heightened scrutiny under the Free Exercise Clause? 2. Do public schools violate the Free Speech Clause when they compel objecting teachers to adhere to such a school policy?

What happens next

The Court must decide whether to hear the case. Polk’s petition was distributed for the Nov. 13, 2026 conference, but that does not mean review was granted or guarantee an order date.

Documents

2

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 11, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 11, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jun 26, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    Feb 23, 2026 · Court records

More questions

1
What legal questions does Polk’s petition raise?
It asks whether the rule from Employment Division v. Smith prevents courts from taking a closer look at her religious-freedom claim, and whether requiring teachers to follow the policy violates their free-speech rights.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 11, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis