Police stops over hemp smell

1. Whether a law enforcement officer violates the Fourth Amendment by seizing a pedestrian's identity and vehicle documents without reasonable suspicion, where the officer admits in a sworn affidavit that he could not see into the vehicle to verify a safety violation? 2. Whether an initially unlawful investigative detention can be retroactively cured or justified under the Fourth Amendment by an officer's subsequent olfactory observation? 3. Whether an officer's sensory detection of an odor that is chemically and scientifically indistinguishable from federally legalized industrial hemp can serve as the sole or determinative basis to establish a "fair probability" of criminal activity under the Fourth Amendment? 4. Whether a court violates summary judgment standards and Tolan v. Cotton by granting qualified immunity based on an officer's subjective claim of "plain smell," where the objective video and affidavit record demonstrates that the officer initiated an unconstitutional detention before making any sensory observations? 5. Whether a criminal dismissal agreement explicitly executed with a textually qualified signature of "all rights reserved without prejudice" bars a subsequent civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 under the public policy constraints of Town of Newton v. Rumery?