Souare v. Tiltscher
In brief
- Where it stands
- Dismissed
Petition denied.
- What it’s about
- Elhadj A. M.
- Who it affects
- The Ohio appeals court's ruling remains in place for Souare, but the Supreme Court did not endorse its reasoning.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
Souare asked the Supreme Court to review his due-process challenges to an Ohio custody ruling, including the handling of objections, missing transcripts, and a finding he says conflicts with the trial court docket. The Court refused to hear his case (denied the petition for review) and did not decide those questions.
Souare's questions concerned when he could object to a court official's decision, missing transcripts, and an appellate finding he says conflicts with the trial-court docket.
Question presented
1. Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment permits a state court to adopt a magistrate's decision immediately upon issuance — eliminating any practical opportunity to object before adoption — and then treat objections filed within the state-created fourteen-day objection period as procedurally forfeited? 2. Whether appellate affirmance of a custody determination affecting fundamental parental rights violates due process when based on an incomplete record after timely requested transcripts were not produced before appellate review? 3. Whether due process is violated when a state appellate court affirms deprivation of fundamental parental rights based on a factual finding — that no objections were filed — that is directly contradicted by the official trial court docket? 4. Whether a documented conflict between the Eighth and Ninth Ohio Appellate Districts regarding notice requirements following same-day adoption of magistrate decisions results in non-uniform protection of federal due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment?
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 1 moreShow fewer
Brief added: Petition
Sources
Primary materials from the Court and the parties. Grounded in docket records and cited sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.