Religious exemptions to vaccine rules
Miller v. McDonald
In brief
- Where it stands
- Petition Pending
Awaiting an order on the petition
- What it’s about
- Amish parents and schools ask the Supreme Court to review New York’s requirement of permanent acts they say conflict with their faith and its refusal to grant religious exemptions, while allowing some secular exemptions.
- What's at stake
- The Amish parents and schools have no Supreme Court ruling yet on whether New York's requirements violate their religious-freedom rights.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
Their petition asks whether these rules violate the Free Exercise Clause and whether the Court should reconsider Smith.
The petition argues that New York allows some secular exemptions but refuses religious ones, and asks how the Free Exercise Clause applies under Mahmoud and whether the Court should reconsider Smith.
Question presented
1. Whether, as applied to the Amish Petitioners, New York’s compulsion of permanent acts that are inconsistent with the religious beliefs and practices parents wish to instill in their children violates the Free Exercise Clause under Mahmoud . 2. Whether, as applied to the Amish Petitioners, New York’s refusal to allow religious exemptions to a law that allows secular exemptions and other comparable secular activity violates the Free Exercise Clause. 3. Whether Smith should be reconsidered.
What happens next
The next step is for the Court to decide whether to hear the case. Oral argument is not scheduled, and no decision date is set.
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Court Order added: Main Document
Show 3 moreShow fewer
Court Order added: Certificate of Word Count
Court Order added: Proof of Service
Brief added: Petition
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.